Change log

Rubric changes, reviews, re-checks and corrections.

  1. 2026-10-14
    Rubric onchain v0.1 and offchain v0.1 published (proposal weights).
  2. 2026-10-21 07:50 · review · Raydium
    Re-run (same result; evidence now cited for every negative row): onchain C (58, coverage 92 %)
  3. 2026-10-21 07:49 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Re-run (same result; evidence now cited for every negative row): onchain C (69, coverage 83 %)
  4. 2026-10-21 06:49 · review · Mayan Finance
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (64, coverage 95 %)
  5. 2026-10-20 22:25 · review · Parcl
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (54, coverage 93 %)
  6. 2026-10-20 21:59 · review · Lulo
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (53, coverage 89 %)
  7. 2026-10-20 21:57 · review · Light Protocol
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (61, coverage 88 %)
  8. 2026-10-20 21:56 · review · Invariant Labs
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain D (35, coverage 76 %)
  9. 2026-10-20 21:42 · review · GLAM
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (55, coverage 94 %)
  10. 2026-10-20 21:41 · review · Garbles Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (58, coverage 78 %)
  11. 2026-10-20 21:40 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (69, coverage 83 %)
  12. 2026-10-20 20:39 · review · Mayan Finance
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (64, coverage 95 %)
  13. 2026-10-20 20:18 · review · Squads
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain A (94, coverage 100 %)
  14. 2026-10-20 19:44 · review · Solana
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (74, coverage 94 %)
  15. 2026-10-20 19:40 · review · Raydium
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (58, coverage 92 %)
  16. 2026-10-20 19:38 · review · Pyth Network
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (68, coverage 95 %)
  17. 2026-10-20 16:04 · review · Parcl
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (54, coverage 93 %)
  18. 2026-10-20 16:01 · review · Orca
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (54, coverage 84 %)
  19. 2026-10-20 15:15 · review · Metaplex
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (70, coverage 96 %)
  20. 2026-10-20 13:30 · review · Marinade
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (77, coverage 95 %)
  21. 2026-10-20 13:25 · review · Lulo
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (53, coverage 89 %)
  22. 2026-10-20 13:21 · review · Light Protocol
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (61, coverage 88 %)
  23. 2026-10-20 13:16 · review · Kamino Finance
    Nightly re-run: onchain B (80, coverage 91 %)
  24. 2026-10-20 13:15 · review · Jupiter
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (65, coverage 90 %)
  25. 2026-10-20 13:06 · review · Jito Network
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (60, coverage 91 %)
  26. 2026-10-20 13:04 · review · Invariant Labs
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain D (35, coverage 76 %)
  27. 2026-10-20 13:01 · review · Helium
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (65, coverage 85 %)
  28. 2026-10-20 12:56 · review · GLAM
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (55, coverage 94 %)
  29. 2026-10-20 12:53 · review · Garbles Labs
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (54, coverage 78 %)
  30. 2026-10-20 12:51 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (69, coverage 83 %)
  31. 2026-10-19 14:25 · review · Squads
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain A (94, coverage 100 %)
  32. 2026-10-19 14:23 · review · Solana
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (74, coverage 94 %)
  33. 2026-10-19 14:19 · review · Raydium
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (58, coverage 92 %)
  34. 2026-10-19 14:10 · review · Pyth Network
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (68, coverage 95 %)
  35. 2026-10-19 14:06 · review · Parcl
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (54, coverage 93 %)
  36. 2026-10-19 14:01 · review · Orca
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (54, coverage 84 %)
  37. 2026-10-19 13:56 · review · Metaplex
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (70, coverage 96 %)
  38. 2026-10-19 13:34 · review · Mayan Finance
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (58, coverage 95 %)
  39. 2026-10-19 13:32 · review · Marinade
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (77, coverage 95 %)
  40. 2026-10-19 13:15 · review · Lulo
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (53, coverage 89 %)
  41. 2026-10-19 13:09 · review · Light Protocol
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (61, coverage 88 %)
  42. 2026-10-19 13:04 · review · Kamino Finance
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain B (83, coverage 91 %)
  43. 2026-10-19 13:02 · review · Jupiter
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (65, coverage 90 %)
  44. 2026-10-19 12:47 · review · Jito Network
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (61, coverage 91 %)
  45. 2026-10-19 12:45 · review · Invariant Labs
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain D (35, coverage 76 %)
  46. 2026-10-19 12:42 · review · Helium
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (65, coverage 85 %)
  47. 2026-10-19 12:33 · review · GLAM
    Forced fresh run (same result; fresh evidence snapshots): onchain C (55, coverage 94 %)
  48. 2026-10-19 12:31 · review · Garbles Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (54, coverage 78 %)
  49. 2026-10-19 12:21 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (69, coverage 83 %)
  50. 2026-10-18 13:06 · review · Invariant Labs
    Forced re-run after renderer fix (Chromium reinstalled): onchain D (35, coverage 76 %)
  51. 2026-10-18 12:57 · review · Squads
    Nightly re-run: onchain A (94, coverage 100 %)
  52. 2026-10-18 12:49 · review · Squads
    Nightly re-run: onchain A (92, coverage 94 %)
  53. 2026-10-18 09:30 · method · Squads
    Method 0.2.5: a build that any OtterSec registry entry matches to the current on-chain hash counts as Met. Re-scored from the stored checks plus a read of the public registry.
  54. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Squads
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  55. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Raydium
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  56. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Pyth Network
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  57. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Orca
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  58. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Metaplex
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  59. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Mayan Finance
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  60. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Marinade
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  61. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Lulo
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  62. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Kamino Finance
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  63. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Jupiter
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  64. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Jito Network
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  65. 2026-10-18 08:10 · method · Ellipsis Labs
    Method 0.2.4: audits by 2+ distinct firms at official sources count as Met; an unreadable token mint is Not read. Re-scored from the stored checks, no new data.
  66. 2026-10-17 16:43 · review · Invariant Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (35, coverage 76 %)
  67. 2026-10-17 06:35 · review · Solana
    Nightly re-run: onchain B (74, coverage 94 %)
  68. 2026-10-17 06:25 · review · Parcl
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (54, coverage 93 %)
  69. 2026-10-17 06:24 · review · Orca
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (52, coverage 84 %)
  70. 2026-10-17 06:19 · review · Mayan Finance
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (51, coverage 95 %)
  71. 2026-10-17 06:10 · review · Lulo
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (45, coverage 89 %)
  72. 2026-10-17 06:09 · review · Light Protocol
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (61, coverage 88 %)
  73. 2026-10-17 06:08 · review · Helium
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (53, coverage 85 %)
  74. 2026-10-17 05:59 · review · GLAM
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (55, coverage 94 %)
  75. 2026-10-17 05:58 · review · Garbles Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (56, coverage 78 %)
  76. 2026-10-17 05:57 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (60, coverage 83 %)
  77. 2026-10-16 14:31 · review · Parcl
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (47, coverage 93 %)
  78. 2026-10-16 14:25 · review · Mayan Finance
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (44, coverage 95 %)
  79. 2026-10-16 14:23 · review · Lulo
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (38, coverage 89 %)
  80. 2026-10-16 14:22 · review · Light Protocol
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (46, coverage 88 %)
  81. 2026-10-16 14:20 · review · GLAM
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (55, coverage 94 %)
  82. 2026-10-16 14:19 · review · Garbles Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain D (46, coverage 78 %)
  83. 2026-10-16 14:18 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Nightly re-run: onchain C (50, coverage 83 %)
  84. 2026-10-16 13:01 · review · Parcl
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain B (83, coverage 75 %)
  85. 2026-10-16 12:59 · review · Mayan Finance
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain insufficient data (30, coverage 67 %)
  86. 2026-10-16 12:58 · review · Lulo
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain B (77, coverage 75 %)
  87. 2026-10-16 12:58 · review · Light Protocol
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain insufficient data (86, coverage 58 %)
  88. 2026-10-16 12:58 · review · Invariant Labs
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain insufficient data (69, coverage 58 %)
  89. 2026-10-16 12:57 · review · GLAM
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain A (91, coverage 75 %)
  90. 2026-10-16 12:57 · review · Garbles Labs
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain insufficient data (76, coverage 67 %)
  91. 2026-10-16 12:57 · review · Ellipsis Labs
    Initial automatic review (indexed): offchain insufficient data (62, coverage 67 %)
  92. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Squads
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: B 70 (cov 95 %); after: B 71 (cov 100 %).
  93. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Solana
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: B 72 (cov 89 %); after: B 74 (cov 94 %).
  94. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Raydium
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: D 48 (cov 88 %); after: D 49 (cov 92 %).
  95. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Pyth Network
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 57 (cov 91 %); after: C 58 (cov 95 %).
  96. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Orca
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 56 (cov 80 %); after: C 57 (cov 84 %).
  97. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Metaplex
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 61 (cov 92 %); after: C 62 (cov 96 %).
  98. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Marinade
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 68 (cov 90 %); after: B 70 (cov 95 %).
  99. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Kamino Finance
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: B 72 (cov 87 %); after: B 74 (cov 91 %).
  100. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Jupiter
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 55 (cov 81 %); after: C 57 (cov 85 %).
  101. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Jito Network
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 58 (cov 88 %); after: C 60 (cov 91 %).
  102. 2026-10-15 10:16 · method · Helium
    Method 0.2.1: the scope declaration and claim status are status-only (never scored). Re-scored from the stored checks, no new fetch. Before: C 52 (cov 81 %); after: C 53 (cov 85 %).
  103. 2026-10-15 07:43 · review · Helium
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (52, coverage 81 %)
  104. 2026-10-15 07:37 · review · Kamino Finance
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain B (72, coverage 87 %)
  105. 2026-10-15 07:36 · review · Raydium
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain D (48, coverage 88 %)
  106. 2026-10-15 07:33 · review · Jito Network
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (58, coverage 88 %)
  107. 2026-10-15 07:29 · review · Metaplex
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (61, coverage 92 %)
  108. 2026-10-15 07:22 · review · Orca
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (56, coverage 80 %)
  109. 2026-10-15 07:21 · review · Marinade
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (68, coverage 90 %)
  110. 2026-10-15 07:20 · review · Pyth Network
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (57, coverage 91 %)
  111. 2026-10-15 07:19 · review · Squads
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain B (70, coverage 95 %)
  112. 2026-10-15 07:19 · review · Jupiter
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain C (55, coverage 81 %)
  113. 2026-10-15 07:18 · review · Solana
    Initial review (operator-run): onchain B (72, coverage 89 %)